Daily Archives: November 2, 2015

Market value of vacant land to be taken over by Govt can not exceed compensation amount ; Supreme Court

“Whether, for the purposes of Wealth Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), the market value of the vacant land belonging to the assessee should be taken at the price which is the maximum compensation payable to the assessee under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1962?” Held Yes  Assessing Officer was not justified in… Read More »

Seller entitled for Compensation in case unduly delay by purchaser : Supreme Court

while dealing with a matter pertaining to specific performance of an agreement for sale of property, it was held that if the purchaser is entitled to claim compensation for deterioration, a fortiori the vendor should also be entitled to compensation for accretion in value of the subject matter of the agreement for specific performance, in case the execution thereof… Read More »

It is the prerogative of the Central Government to accept or reject th recommendations of the Wage Boards : Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ABP Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. [WritPetition (Civil) No. 246 of 2011], 7th February, 2014 while holding that the Justice Majithia Wage Boards for Working Journalists and Non-Journalist Newspaper and News Agency Employees followed certain well laid down principles and norms while making recommendations, it was furthe held that… Read More »

Bharat Bill Payment System (BBPS) Guidelines

RBI/2014-15/327 DPSS.CO.PD. No. 940 /02.27.020/2014-2015 November 28, 2014 Implementation of Bharat Bill Payment System (BBPS) – Guidelines Introduction 1. Bill payment is a major component of the retail payment transactions. The Committee to study the Feasibility of Implementation of GIRO based Payment Systems (Chairman: Shri G. Padmanabhan, Executive Director, RBI) (2013) had estimated that over… Read More »

Mere availing of services of non resident company for global market survey is not fees for Technical Services hence not TDS

Mere availing of services of non-resident company for global market survey to determine business prospects to carry out project in India is not ‘ Fees for Technical Services’ under India UK Treaty Income Tax Officer v. Skill Infrastructure Ltd.,  [ITAT Mum.] ITA No. 865-867 of 2011 Date of Decision:  July 29, 2015 Facts of the… Read More »

CENVAT Credit on Concrete sleepers used for laying railway line for movement of goods allowed

Concrete sleepers used for laying railway line for movement of goods between plant facilities installed within factory premises; and JO trucks for movement of nitrogen and oxygen gas cylinders within factory, are eligible for Cenvat credit as ‘input’ CESTAT, NEW DELHI BENCH Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur S.K. MOHANTY,… Read More »

Amendment regarding equal right for daughters over property is prospective: Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PRAKASH & ORS VERSUS PHULAVATI & ORS. CIVIL APPEAL NO.7217 OF 2013 Date : 16/10/2015 Issue :  whether Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (‘the Amendment Act’) will have retrospective effect. ? Facts of the case :- According to the case of the plaintiff, the suit properties were acquired by her late… Read More »

Special Judge is not expected to try non PC offences totally unconnected with any PC offences under Prevention of Corruption Act

Supreme Court of India State through CBI, New Delhi v. Jitender Kumar Singh [Criminal Appeal No.943 of 2008], 5th February, 2014 It was held that “a Special Judge exercising powers under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is not expected to try non-PC offences totally unconnected with any PC offences under Section 3(1) of the… Read More »

Mere issuance of a notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is not sufficient for any land being declared a “private forest” : Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Civil Appeal No.1102 of 2014] 30th January, 2014  It was held that the mere issuance of a notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is not sufficient for any land being declared a… Read More »

Compensation Deposited in the government treasury not equivalent to paid to landowners : Supreme court

Supreme Court of India  Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki & Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2014],  24th January, 2014 In a land acquisition matter, it was held that deposit of the amount of compensation in the government treasury cannot be said to be equivalent to the amount of compensation paid… Read More »

Stay of disciplinary proceedings advisable in case criminal charge is grave : Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India M/s Stanzen Toyotetsu India P. Ltd. v. Girish V & Ors.  [Civil Appeal Nos. 763-768 of 2014], 21st January, 2014 Question arose for consideration as to whether disciplinary proceedings initiated by appellant-company against its employees (respondents) ought to remain stayed pending conclusion of the criminal case instituted against the respondents in… Read More »