Category Archives: GST

Important GST Case Laws 22.04.2026

By | April 22, 2026

Important GST Case Laws 22.04.2026 Section Case Law Title / Authority Key Legal Verdict Citation Sec 11 (CGST) Narasus Saarathy Enterprises Brand Name Exemption: A farmer’s image on packaging is a “brand,” but exemption is allowed if the taxpayer files an affidavit specifically foregoing actionable rights to that brand. Click Here Sec 16(4) Om Sakthi… Read More »

Category: GST

A sale concluded via auction before July 1, 2017, remains taxable under the old regime (Sales Tax), even if payments continue post-GST.

By | April 22, 2026

A sale concluded via auction before July 1, 2017, remains taxable under the old regime (Sales Tax), even if payments continue post-GST. The Dispute: Old Tax vs. New GST The Conflict: The petitioner bought timber in e-auctions held in April and May 2017 (pre-GST). The contract allowed for staged payments extending past July 1, 2017… Read More »

Category: GST

Maintaining the same gross ticket price after a GST rate cut constitutes profiteering; base prices cannot be hiked to absorb the tax benefit.

By | April 22, 2026

Maintaining the same gross ticket price after a GST rate cut constitutes profiteering; base prices cannot be hiked to absorb the tax benefit. The Dispute: Static Prices vs. Commensurate Reduction The Conflict: Effective from January 1, 2019, the GST on cinema tickets was significantly reduced: Tickets > ₹100: Reduced from 28% to 18%. Tickets ≤… Read More »

Category: GST

The “Authorized Operations” requirement for SEZ refunds is not retrospective and applies only from October 1, 2023.

By | April 22, 2026

The “Authorized Operations” requirement for SEZ refunds is not retrospective and applies only from October 1, 2023. The Dispute: Retrospective vs. Prospective Law The Conflict: The petitioner, a unit in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), claimed a refund of GST paid on services received between March 2020 and June 2023. The Tax Department rejected/challenged the… Read More »

Category: GST

Section 16(5) Retrospectively Cures Belated ITC Claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21.

By | April 22, 2026

Section 16(5) Retrospectively Cures Belated ITC Claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21. The Dispute: The “Dead” Credit revived by Law The Conflict: For the period April 2018 to March 2019, the Petitioner had claimed ITC after the deadline prescribed under Section 16(4). The Department issued a Show-Cause Notice (SCN) and passed an order demanding the… Read More »

Category: GST

Statutory disclosures (FSSAI/Metrology) and disclaimed generic graphics do not constitute a “brand” for GST.

By | April 22, 2026

Statutory disclosures (FSSAI/Metrology) and disclaimed generic graphics do not constitute a “brand” for GST. I. The “Branding” Dispute: Identity vs. Compliance The Conflict: The petitioner sold unbranded maida and sooji. The bags displayed a generic picture of farmers and the company’s full corporate name. The Department alleged this was “branded” because it looked like the… Read More »

Category: GST

Important GST Case Laws 21.04.2026

By | April 22, 2026

Important GST Case Laws 21.04.2026 Section Case Law Title / Authority Key Legal Verdict Citation Sec 7 (CGST) Neha Piyush Shah v. UoI Voucher Taxation: Tax is only applicable on the commission or fee earned; the entire face value of the voucher sale-purchase turnover is not taxable. Click Here Sec 11 (CGST) Gorantla Geosynthetics (AAR)… Read More »

Category: GST

AAR Rules: Bio-mining Services to Governmental Authorities are Exempt Under Sl. No. 3, Notification 12/2017.

By | April 22, 2026

AAR Rules: Bio-mining Services to Governmental Authorities are Exempt Under Sl. No. 3, Notification 12/2017. The Dispute: Classification vs. Exemption The applicant was contracted by the Goa Waste Management Corporation (GWMC) to handle the remediation of legacy waste (old, accumulated garbage) at specific sites in Goa. This process, known as Bio-mining, involves excavation, screening using… Read More »

Category: GST

Omission of Rule 96(10) in October 2024 retroactively quashes all pending IGST refund disputes.

By | April 22, 2026

Omission of Rule 96(10) in October 2024 retroactively quashes all pending IGST refund disputes. The Dispute: The “Rule 96(10)” Roadblock The Conflict: Petitioners (exporters) had claimed IGST refunds on goods exported. The Customs Department issued Show-Cause Notices (SCNs) and denied these refunds by invoking Rule 96(10). The Restriction: This rule essentially blocked exporters from claiming… Read More »

Category: GST